Using Test-Driven Development the right way

Sent 3 months ago
1 min read

Hey {{ subscriber.first_name }}

I have been applying Test-Driven Development for quite some time, and I think it provides an excellent foundation for creating quality code.

But one thing has always been bothering me, handling sub-systems correctly.

Let me explain with an example.

Methods with a return value

If I have a method without any direct dependencies like below. It is easy to write a test for it. The production code is self-contained with no dependencies.

The return value is all I care to assert. Easy!

​

Methods that pass requests to a subsystem

But if I have a method whose responsibility is to pass the request on to a subsystem, I have to mock the sub-system to know if the code is correct.

It can’t be asserted from the return value alone.

Consider this example; we need to know if the mapping from the controller to the service is correct. To do that, a mock of the UserService is needed.

​
​

I like the first example because I can test what I need without knowing anything about the implementation.

But the second example has always given me a cringe feeling because it binds my test to the implementation details.

Different schools of thought

Then I discovered that the two examples correspond to two different schools of thought: the first called inside-out and the second outside-in.

Inside-out focuses on testing behavior and avoiding dependencies.

Outside-in makes heavy use of mocks to test the implementation.

None of the approaches are wrong. They just have a different focus.

πŸ‘‰ Read more on the different schools in my latest article.​

Have you come across difficulties with TDD? Hit reply and let me know.

​
​

Built with ConvertKit